Croak More Frogs, or Croak The County?!
Ventura (not Ojai) County Plans Further Public Indoctrination in their VIolence Against the People and Bioreserves of the Matilija Canyon and the Ojai Riverbottom ... tomorrow, July 1st.
to quote the County of Ventura, "Killing is OK!"
Patty Pageling wrote:
Please come to the county meeting: Tuesday July 1st, 7pm at the Chaparral Auditorium. It would be great if we could all be at the meeting to voice our concerns and to let the county know that we, the people, want the poisoning to stop. It is our right NOT to be exposed to poisonous chemicals against our will.
I talked with a biologist this last week who is contracted by the county to monitor the spraying, and he said there have been bull frogs found dead in the creek due to the spraying, but he said "that's ok" because the county wants to kill off the bull frogs, because they claim they are "not [Ojai] natives". Even if they don't like bull frogs, doesn't that indicate that the poison is affecting all frogs, including the native frogs???


Comments (15)
when/where/who took this photo?
Comment #1 Posted by: ? | June 30, 2008 03:49 PM
The picture is NOT from Matilija Canyon. It was shot in 2004 in Aberdeenshire, Scotland.
Maybe he didn't croak; maybe he was kilt.
Comment #2 Posted by: Dennis | June 30, 2008 06:33 PM
The county is willing to experiment with the very lives of all the species in Ventura county -- when evidence against glyphosate use has been in for decades:
http://www.mindfully.org/Pesticide/Roundup-Glyphosate-Factsheet-Cox.htm
Check out the usual county lies told in 2007 (including, for example, "if herbicide is detected in the river the operations will be modified and carefully monitored"):
http://pages.sbcglobal.net/pjenkin/matilija/news.htm
The mega-poisoning of our teeming wild is a shameless and idiotic abuse of power on the part of Steve Bennett and his colleagues.
Without the consent of the creatures -- human or otherwise -- that live on and in this land, these officials have bequeathed to Ventura County an unredeemable legacy of poison, poison, and more poison.
Got death?
Sincerely,
Jock Doubleday
Director
Natural Woman, Natural Man, Inc.
A California 501(c)3 Nonprofit Corporation
http://www.spontaneouscreation.org
director@spontaneouscreation.org
Comment #3 Posted by: Jock Doubleday | June 30, 2008 06:51 PM
ah dinna see no kilt!
Comment #4 Posted by: Donald | June 30, 2008 09:05 PM
"WATER QUALITY
The Los Padres provides the major source of water for 37 reservoirs within and near the national forest, providing water for central coast towns and a rich variety of agricultural crops. While most of these waterways remain in good condition, several others are becoming increasingly impaired and polluted. In fact, the Forest Service admits that nearly half (17) of the watersheds in the Los Padres are in “moderate” or “poor” condition.
Water pollution spells significant problems for communities, agriculture, tourism, recreation, and habitat. Several communities – Santa Barbara, Ventura, Carmel, Monterey, Ojai, Arroyo Grande, and others – receive their drinking water from rivers that originate in the Los Padres. Many watersheds within the Los Padres drain directly into the Pacific Ocean, including the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary.
Roads are the main source of water pollution in the Los Padres, causing increased sedimentation and erosion. Other activities that impact water quality include grazing, mining, fuels management, and oil drilling. As a result of these activities, at least 10 streams classified as “impaired” by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency originate in, or flow through, the national forest. Despite recurring water quality problems in several areas, the Forest Service devotes only 8% of its resource management budget on protecting water quality."
Los Padres ForestWatch
Original article http://www.lpfw.org/projects/rivers.htm
Comment #5 Posted by: Anonymous | July 1, 2008 10:14 AM
thanks Patty,
for your continued and expanding outreach.
sorry to hear this is a COUNTY Meeting ... indoctrinating the public in their program of violence.
their ONLY concern is money and power, and that is why the meeting.
it has NOTHING to do with CaneGrass ... they are killing everything in contact with the poison ... nearly all plants, all amphibians, all reptiles, all birds, all fish, and more!
and these, particularly amphibians which have been killed off 90 percent in California, are what wetlands are about. the wetlands are about amphibians, and all life. not the fishermen and the corporate/government goonsquads.
whose Capitalist Cult programs ONLY result in LESS forests, LESS watersheds, LESS life!
we should coordinate a REAL meeting of the PUBLIC who want to see an end to County and other violences against the people of the Ojai Valley, against the watershed and the wildlife.
all our relations,
Millennium Twain
if and WHEN we want to remove the Canegrass, WE will
do so ... and it will be a years or decades long project,
and it will be organic and wonderful!
not deadly and bestial, power-playing and money-grubbing,
like this overlord County of Ventura!
Comment #6 Posted by: Millennium | July 1, 2008 11:23 AM
bestial?!
overlord County of Ventura??
Comment #7 Posted by: sea buscuit | July 1, 2008 06:27 PM
Without a doubt, maintaining pesticide free watersheds is important for every community.
Comment #8 Posted by: Anonymous | July 1, 2008 08:40 PM
that'sa no dead frog, he' only a fakin. look at hisa tongue!
Comment #9 Posted by: Antonio | July 1, 2008 11:05 PM
Patty, all,
Any news from 'Gangster-Dumb' last night? Their POISON-OJAI Campaign?
Of the 'Ventura' County Goon Squad!
Comment #10 Posted by: Millennium | July 2, 2008 02:18 PM
California Penal Code
CRIMES AGAINST THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY
Any person who knowingly causes any hazardous substance to be deposited into or upon any road, street, highway, alley, or railroad right-of-way, or upon the land of another, without the permission of the owner, or into the waters of this State is punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year or by imprisonment in the State prison for a term of 16 months, two years, or three years ...
Comment #11 Posted by: Anon | July 2, 2008 10:42 PM
What is a watershed?
The watershed is the total land area from which rainwater drains into a creek, river, lake, ocean or any body of water. The watershed includes all of the natural terrain and neighborhoods surrounding these major water bodies, including your home or business. In Ventura County our primary watersheds include the Ventura and Santa Clara Rivers, Malibu and Calleguas Creeks, and the bays and estuaries – all of which empty into the Pacific Ocean.
"the watershed should only shed water"
http://www.cleanwatershed.org/
Comment #12 Posted by: Anonymous | July 2, 2008 11:11 PM
Ojai Chemo-Desert, not.
Ojai Valley Watershed, nice.
Ojai Valley-Wide Wetlands Forest Chaparral mix, better. Before the Spanish priests and agriculture, this Valley my ancestors flitted across was as much Wetland as Oak forest and Chaparral brushland.
Immense lifefilled OASIS created by the vast surrounding Mountain chains, which can be brought back by stepwise returning of the creeks and diversiculture and wetlands and relationship with our Mother Earth.
Comment #13 Posted by: Water Strider | July 3, 2008 02:16 PM
http://ojaivalleynews.blogspot.com/2008/07/herbacide-fears-prompt-meeting.html
Comment #14 Posted by: News Coverage on the Subject | July 4, 2008 12:21 PM
N.Y. Attorney General slams Monsanto on glyphosate use
Steve Bennett, L-1900
800 S. Victoria Ave.
Ventura, CA, 93009
Phone: (805) 654-2703
Fax: (805) 654-2226
email to [steve.bennett-at-ventura.org]
Steve,
It's official: You and your colleagues didn't do your research.
You should have known through basic research -- and now you do know, after reading many emails from concerned citizens -- that inundating Ventura County with glyphosate will disfigure Ventura County's ecology, impact human health, and possibly send endangered fish, amphibian, and bird species to extinction.
But hey, the county's arundo will be gone. Maybe.
* * *
Subject: IT'S OFFICIAL: Glyphosate NOT environmentally friendly: Monsanto Forced to Change Ads
January 10, 1997
Pesticide Action Network North America
(PANNA), San Francisco, CA.
Monsanto Agrees to Change Ads
Monsanto Co. agreed to change its advertising for glyphosate-based products, including Roundup, in response to complaints by the New York Attorney General's office that the ads were misleading.
Based on their investigation, the Attorney General's office felt that the advertising inaccurately portrayed Monsanto's glyphosate-containing products as safe and as not causing any harmful effects to people or the environment.
According to the state, the ads also implied that the risks of products such as Roundup are the same as those of the active ingredient, glyphosate, and do not take into account the possible risks associated with the product's inert ingredients.
As part of the agreement, Monsanto will discontinue the use of terms such as "biodegradable" and "environmentally friendly" in all advertising of glyphosate-containing products in New York state and will pay $50,000 toward the state's costs of pursuing the case.
The Attorney General has been challenging the ads since 1991. [Monster] Monsanto maintains that it did not violate any federal, state or local law and that its claims were "true and not misleading in any way." The company states that they entered into the agreement for settlement purposes only in order to avoid costly litigation.
According to a 1993 report published by the School of Public Health at the University of California, Berkeley, glyphosate was the third most commonly-reported cause of pesticide illness among agricultural workers. Another study from the School of Public Health found that glyphosate was the most commonly reported cause of pesticide illness among landscape maintenance workers. (Both studies were based on data collected between 1984 and 1990.)
In the first nine months of 1996, Monsanto's worldwide
agrochemical sales increased by 21% to US$2.48 billion, due largely to increased sales of Roundup.
Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA)
Phone: (415) 541-9140
Fax: (415) 541-9253
see panna-dot-org
* * *
If you and your colleagues want to discover -- too late -- the astonishingly toxic effects of glyphosate, go here:
[go to mindfully-dot-org, click on Pesticides, then click on Roundup.]
This article takes 25 pages to list all of the toxic effects -- and key scientific studies documenting the toxic effects -- of glyphosate.
One of several hundred alarming facts in this article:
"The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has identified 74 endangered plant species that it believes could be jeopardized by glyphosate. This list is based on the use of glyphosate on 9 crops, and does not include over 50 other uses."
Ventura County's use of glyphosate to "eradicate arundo may make Ventura County, and certain employees thereof, responsible for the extinction of plant and animal species.
Do county supervisors and staff desire accountability -- moral and legal -- for such a negative and historic outcome?
Sincerely,
Jock Doubleday
Director
Natural Woman, Natural Man, Inc.
A California 501(c)3 Nonprofit Corporation
Comment #15 Posted by: New York | July 6, 2008 08:48 AM