Michael Urbanek, who only recently has begun participating on The Ojai Post as a commenter, has written a Guest Editorial published by the Ojai Valley News titled Letter to Ojai Liberals, which denigrates The Ojai Post readers, and those he refers to in general as "liberal". He didn't approach The Ojai Post to publish it first - he took his editorial straight to the OVN.
Beneath a very thin veneer of bipartisanship, Urbanek layers his editorial with subtle digs and assumptive caricatures of liberals, ignoring a wide variety of evidence from the "reality-based community". I'm not going to call Urbanek names, but I am going to address his comments head on, and if that qualifies as "meanness" in his book, then so be it.
Urbanek says "Before I go any further, can we stipulate that left, right, liberal, and conservative aren’t bad words?"
Sure, we can if we decide to have a conversation in a vacuum, that ignores the incredible polarity that has been hoisted on American politics by the Republican party. From Cheney and Rove on down to the mouthpieces of Limbaugh, Coulter, Hannity, O'Reilly and countless other GOP soldiers, liberals have been demonized as "surrender monkeys", "America haters", "terrorist sympathizers" and worse. These aren't isolated right-wing bloggers throwing these insults - it goes to the very highest levels of media and politics on the right.
So for Urbanek to point the finger at "those on the left" for fostering "meanness and lack of ability to listen to another opinion" shows a serious denial of the fracture that has been caused by the GOP which has used the blunt weapons of fear and accusations to push forward an agenda that includes Iraq, environmental rollbacks, destruction of the middle class, degradation of civil liberties, advocation of torture and more.
Urbanek proceeds to give liberals some grandfatherly advice. Action Item No. 1, he says, is that the OVN needs to publish conservative thought. He implies that what gets published in the OVN is the work of liberals. And what exactly is it that gets published? "Anger displayed in letters to the editor and thumbs up/down, [that] emboldens people. It makes them crazy. They begin to think they are normal. Accusations fly and conspiracy theories abound."
For someone that doesn't want to name-call, Urbanek sure picks a back-handed way of doing so. If I follow his logic, conservatives don't get published in the OVN, liberals do. The people that write in go "crazy and think they are normal." Therefore, liberals are crazy but think they are normal. Nice.
Let's proceed. Conservatives, says Urbanek,"are living their lives, going to work, raising their families and accomplishing things. This will come as a shock to most Ojai folks, but conservatives don’t want to run anyone else’s lives."
What Urbanek and other self-labeled conservatives would like to do is separate themselves from the Republican party. Because associating oneself with the Republican party means advocating or at least ignoring the tidal wave of rubber-stamped policies and legislation that place the GOP squarely in your bedroom, from warrantless wiretapping and gay marriage to overturning Roe v. Wade and even banning birth control. But conservatives own this president and this administration, and try as they might, their votes put Bush in office not once, but twice. The conservatives bear the Bush albatross, despite their increasingly panicked attempts to heave it overboard, in favor of the next fear-based, Christian fundamentalist suckup Republican candidate.
Liberals, continues Urbanek, "own the public education system, and the best and brightest are trained to properly manage their trust funds, get elected, and subsequently tell us how to live. By the way, the liberal elite does not live that way themselves."
This is absurd and insulting. I mean, really, Michael, is there a bigger example of a trust fund recipient who gets elected and subsequently tells us how to live (in fear of the Islamofascists) than President Bush? And how about Mitt Romney, worth $250 million with five trust fund sons who have avoided the war to campaign for their daddy? But that's a sidetrack - the caricature you have created is false. First of all, I would seriously dispute the notion that there are somehow more liberals with trust funds than conservatives. Secondly, the GOP is far more interested in cutting taxes to the benefit of those 1% elite (conservative or liberal), than providing basic services such as education, health care, social security or anything other than a vast military machine.
Urbanek give us "Action Item No. 2: Bush derangement syndrome has spiraled out of control. You need to give it a rest. A mind is a terrible thing to waste, even a liberal one. As with many bad habits, the first step is to acknowledge that you have a problem."
First of all, those on the right (many of whom could easily be diagnosed with Monica-triggered Clinton Derangement Syndrome) love to brush away criticism of this president and this administration as the rants of crazy people who hate. Urbanek, who wants the left to find an "ability to listen to another opinion", simply dismisses those who disagree with this administration as haters. You can't have it both ways, and Republicans want it that way - they don't want to discuss the serious and dire state of the nation on the facts and merits, they want to reduce it to hate and fear. Because that's all they have to work with. Their policies have been roundly rejected by a vast majority of Americans on issue after issue, and the only thing left is to say, "terrorists, gay people, brown people, boo".
Urbanek goes on to list why liberals "hate George Bush", and its a darn good list for a start. But the fact is, there is a big difference between an educated populace that collectively agrees that Bush is an awful president, perhaps the worst EVER, for a litany of reasons, and simply "hating" him.
He doesn't give enough credit to people for taking a look at the devastation that this president has wrought, and making up their mind that he is bad for America, his policies are bad for America, and the GOP doesn't deserve to get a whiff of the White House for the next twenty years. Instead, he dismisses it as hate. And of course, I am sure he can come up with many measured, well thought out reasons why liberalism is bad for the country, and can disassociate himself from George "not a true conservative" Bush, but its hypocritical to assume that those on the other side of the aisle can't do the same.
Urbanek then condescends with this gem: “George Bush is not running for president in 2008. Read it calmly, slowly and, most importantly, without emotion. That will be difficult at first, but you must keep trying. Repetition and discipline are the keys. I realize that discipline thing is a hard one, too, but trust me — I am only trying to help you. Bush is going to be gone."
Well, Michael, I am going to try to help you: Bush may be leaving office, but he is still owned by the GOP and conservatives that have sold out to the religious right, the neocons and faceless multinational corporations. And any Republican that stays in power is part of the same machine. So it doesn't matter who your nominee is, they are part of the exact same machine that has produced Iraq, Katrina and the other failed policies of the last seven years. YOU OWN IT, and getting rid of Bush doesn't change a thing.
Regarding Hillary, she is actually far down the list of desirable candidates among true progressives. Hillary triangulates, she voted for Iraq, is keeping nuclear war on the table and in my mind, lacks principle. Again, your caricatures of liberals are nothing more than paper dolls. I would think you would find Hillary far more palatable a president than Edwards or Obama, despite the Hillary Derangement Syndrome that has been drummed into your head by Rush, Bill, Sean, Ann and the others.
And let me conclude on this second anniversary of the Katrina disaster, where thousands lost their homes, their lives, their families while Bush ate cake and strummed a guitar, Condi Rice shopped for shoes and attended Spamalot on Broadway, Brownie fumbled, Chertoff stumbled and Cheney disappeared into his bunker, your comments on "understand[ing] what some of our conservative principles are."
Here are your conservative principles in action. I'm comfortable in letting the American people decide what it means to be, in your words, "left, right, liberal, and conservative". In my mind, and the majority of our little enlightened community, its an easy choice.

Respectfully yours,
Tyler Suchman
The Ojai Post
Recent Comments
[Suza] on PET PSYCHIC ON TI
[Laura Stinc] on PET PSYCHIC ON TI
[Suza] on PET PSYCHIC ON TI
[] on PET PSYCHIC ON TI
[Syd] on VCSD: Commercial
[Gravel Truc] on VCSD: Commercial
[Gravel Truc] on VCSD: Commercial