The Omnivore's Dilemma
What no cage? and they even have beaks!
In early March I posted a story about the dialogue between Michael Pollan, author of The Omnivore's Dilemma and John Mackey, founder and CEO of Whole Foods Market.
I just finished reading Pollan's book and not only is it an informative glimpse into the un-nature of our industrial food industry it is really an entertaining read as well. Here is an excerpt from a Mother Jones magazine article; http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2006/05/no_bar_code.html
It begs the important issues of what IS organic, how it has been coopted by the USDA, the importanced of buying, eating, supporting local and becoming aware of the food chain that occurs starting with the sun and ending in your belly, or actually the water treatment plant.
The premise of the book is best spoken in Pollan's own words:
So what exactly would an ecological detective set loose in an American supermarket discover, were he to trace the items in his shopping cart all the way back to the soil? The notion began to occupy me a few years ago, after I realized that the straightforward question "What should I eat?" could no longer be answered without first addressing two other even more straightforward questions: "What am I eating? And where in the world did it come from?" Not very long ago an eater didn't need a journalist to answer these questions. The fact that today one so often does suggests a pretty good start on a working definition of industrial food: Any food whose provenance is so complex or obscure that it requires expert help to ascertain.
When I started trying to follow the industrial food chain -- the one that now feeds most of us most of the time and typically culminates either in a supermarket or fast-food meal -- I expected that my investigations would lead me to a wide variety of places. And though my journeys did take me to a great many states, and covered a great many miles, at the very end of these food chains (which is to say, at the very beginning), I invariably found myself in almost exactly the same place: a farm field in the American Corn Belt. The great edifice of variety and choice that is an American supermarket turns out to rest on a remarkably narrow biological foundation comprised of a tiny group of plants that is dominated by a single species: Zea mays, the giant tropical grass most Americans know as corn.
Excerpted from "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan. Reprinted by arrangement with the Penguin Press, a member of Penguin Group (USA) Inc. Copyright © 2006 by Michael Pollan.


Comments (5)
Excellent article! Thank you.
Comment #1 Posted by: Suza | April 21, 2007 10:33 PM
Great post Raymond. I was wondering how do CSAs deal with the problem of cross-pollination from patented stocks of industrial farming. I know in California those I.Fs. have some incredible legal rights to go on another farm to see if the farmer next to theirs or several miles away, has plants that are the result of pollination from I.Fs. to the innocent farmers stocks. Then they have the right to demand money. Yet the innocent farmer can't sue them for contaminating their stock.
Comment #2 Posted by: Dana and Alyeska-kg6amv@yahoo.com | April 22, 2007 03:50 AM
Thanks for the info. But it begs the whole question of whether animals ought to be eaten at all. It is ironic also that people are burning up so much oil to get to the farm. Come on. Someone driving a Mercedes to buy chickens and comparing prices with the local supermarket? How few see the insanity in this. Why? We live in a culture of money which drives almost everything, and drives us crazy. We are money addicts, and the food issue illustrates it to a tee.
I eat mostly whole organic grains, beans, vegetables, a few nuts and fresh fruit that I can pick, mostly oranges. Grains and beans have to be shipped, however, which in this case is legitimate, and hopefully from not too far away.
I believe the real sustainable solution is to stop eating animals. It is a violent action, no matter how it is rationalized. Nature includes animal killing in her grand scheme but she mitigates it. Man sometimes has to kill animals to survive but we pay a high price for it in a culture of violence. Today it is not necessary for animal killing to go on. I believe animals should be allowed dignity and freedom. Man needs to mitigate violence and that means eating as far down the food chain as possible which is mostly grains and vegetables. The first animal right is freedom, and that is freedom from being tortured and killed. It also implies freedom from being put in zoos and circuses, and from being forced to be pets to humans because humans need to get their love and control needs met through animals. A huge amount of psychic and physical energy is sucked away from human to human love and displaced onto animals who have no choice in the matter. The natural human to animal to plant relationship has been subverted through greed and ignorance. The food and animal problem is a human problem. The smartest humans are still trying to catch up to the dumbest animals. The money monster poisons and addicts us to fast, frozen foods; then offers salvation through drugs, insurance and medical care. Insanity. People can't even boil rice anymore; they head for a restaurant or the frozen food section and then to a mircowave. Insanity. Insanity I say. Old man Midas learned he couldn't eat money. We haven't learned that yet.
The food issue opens up a whole can of worms. I'm glad you brought opened up the can, hopefully with a manual opener.
Comment #3 Posted by: Dennis Leary | April 22, 2007 09:12 AM
So then what would you propose to do with all of the millions of domesticated industrial food animals that have been born and raised and could not survive by themselves in the wild and are dependent on the animal/human relationship.
Or are you saying eat them all and then don't raise anymore?
Comment #4 Posted by: anonymous | April 22, 2007 09:23 AM
The path back to sanity is a slow and gradual process. Rome wasn't built in a day and neither will utopia but we'll never get there unless we know where we're going. There is a grandfather clause.
Comment #5 Posted by: Dennis Leary | April 23, 2007 11:39 AM