About Us

www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Flickr tagged with ojaipost. Make your own badge here.


© 2006-2008 The Ojai Post
all rights reserved

The views expressed herein are the personal views of each individual author or commenter and are not intended to reflect the views of The Ojai Post or its Authors, Tribal Core or Tyler Suchman as managing editor.

Back to The Ojai Post home

Americans Surprised, Concerned that 90% of Flu Shots Contain Mercury

This is a topic I have recently learned about from my friend Jock Doubleday. I rarely see a doctor and have no children so this health concern has eluded me. Though my 86 year old mother, who gets a flu shot yearly, did complain of a myriad of symptoms this year after she received her vaccine.

This article is from the Organic Consumers website.

Americans Surprised, Concerned that 90% of Flu Shots Contain Mercury

* Health Officials' Aggressive Flu Shot Campaign May Disregard Safety, According to Survey of 9,000 Americans
*74 Percent of Respondents Unaware Flu Shots Contain Mercury, 78 Percent Disagree with CDC About Vaccinating Pregnant Women and Children

PRNewswire, Nov 13, 2006
Straight to the Source

PORTLAND, Ore., Nov. 13 /PRNewswire/ -- As health officials step up their effort to vaccinate Americans against the flu, a new survey suggests serious concerns over the toxin mercury, an ingredient in over 90 percent of this season's flu shot supply. PutChildrenFirst.org, a parent-led organization advocating vaccine safety, commissioned a survey of over 9,000 Americans to learn their plans for getting flu shots, their knowledge of its ingredients, and who they hold responsible for making sure vaccines are safe.

The survey revealed that the overwhelming majority of Americans were unaware that most flu shots contain mercury and that they would refuse a shot with mercury.

"More than 75 percent of Americans feel a mercury-containing flu shot should not be given to a pregnant woman or a child, despite recommendations from medical authorities to do just that," said Lisa Handley, a founding parent of PutChildrenFirst.org. Her own son, Jamison, had an adverse reaction to a flu shot containing mercury in 2003. "I know firsthand how life-changing a flu shot with mercury can be, since our son began his regression into autism after his flu shot."

In 1999, government agencies called for the removal of Thimerosal, the mercury-based preservative in most vaccines. Then, in 2001, the American Academy of Pediatrics stated that, "mercury in all of its forms is toxic to the fetus and children, and efforts should be made to reduce exposure to the extent possible to pregnant women and children as well as the general population." Despite these actions, 90 percent of this season's flu vaccines still contain Thimerosal, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are recommending the vaccine for pregnant women and children six months and older.

These recommendations come on the heels of recent studies that reveal new findings about the neurological effects of mercury and question the effectiveness of flu shots. Mercury, the second most toxic element after plutonium, is estimated to be 500 to 1,000 times more toxic than lead.

"A common myth is that Thimerosal is added to vaccines in 'trace' amounts," said Mike Wagnitz, who has over 20 years experience evaluating materials for mercury and is employed as a senior chemist with the University of Wisconsin. "The concentration of mercury in a multi-dose flu vaccine vial is 50,000 parts per billion. To put this in perspective, drinking water cannot exceed 2 parts per billion of mercury, and waste is considered hazardous if it has only 200 parts per billion. Is it really safe then to inject pregnant women, newborns, and infants with levels of mercury 250 times higher than what is legally classified as hazardous waste?"

Agreeing that mercury has no place in vaccines, seven states have passed Thimerosal bans in recent years: California, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, New York, and Washington. California is the first to have implemented the ban for the current flu season, but Governor Schwarzenegger temporarily overturned the ban on November 2 after a shortage of mercury-free flu shots led to pressure from state medical groups.

"Parents need to be informed about all aspects of their children's healthcare, including vaccines," said Deirdre Imus, President and founder of The Deirdre Imus Environmental Center for Pediatric Oncology at Hackensack University Medical Center and co-founder and co-director, with husband Don Imus, of The Imus Cattle Ranch for Kids with Cancer. "It doesn't make common sense to inject Thimerosal, a known neurotoxin, into the bloodstream of our babies."

This fall, two studies were published in leading medical journals admitting that limited data exists to support the effectiveness of flu shots. One study, in the Journal of the American Medical Association, noted that, "there is scant data on the efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccine in young children."

"So, not only is the flu shot's effectiveness in doubt, there is plenty of evidence revealing the devastating effects of mercury," said J.B. Handley, Lisa's husband and a founder of PutChildrenFirst.org. "Our health authorities are not being forthcoming about mercury's presence in shots and its toxicity to the nervous system. Our children deserve better."

"With everything we know about the dangers of mercury and the havoc it can wreak on young, developing brains, there is no excuse for any vaccine to contain mercury," said Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN, President of SafeMinds, a nonprofit committed to ending mercury-induced neurological disorders. "The survey reveals that Americans are overwhelmingly in the dark about what is in most flu shots. They do not want a known neurotoxin injected into their children, and they believe Congress and medical professionals must be more vigilant about keeping vaccines safe and mercury-free."

Key findings from the poll, conducted October 27-30 by Zogby International, include:

* 74 percent of respondents are unaware that most flu shots contain mercury.
* After learning that mercury is an ingredient, 74 percent are less likely to get a flu shot and 86 percent of parents say they are less likely to get their child a flu shot.
* 78 percent of respondents believe mercury should not be an ingredient in flu shots given to pregnant women and children.
* 73 percent believe the government should warn pregnant women not to get a flu shot if it contains mercury.
* More than 70 percent agree that Congress, doctors and medical groups (e.g., the American Academy of Pediatrics) should take responsibility for ensuring that vaccines do not contain mercury.
* 80 percent of respondents and 82 percent of parents are willing to pay the $2.50 additional cost for a mercury-free flu shot.

PutChildrenFirst.org is a parent-led initiative advocating vaccine safety and a division of Generation Rescue, a nonprofit organization providing parents with information on the relationship between mercury and its relationship to Autism Spectrum Disorders. Generation Rescue gives parents information to make informed decisions about treatment options and physicians. Generation Rescue is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit founded in 2005.

Comments (6)

Thanks for passing this on. I started looking in to vaccines when my graduate school in Oregon required a second measles vaccine to stay on campus. That's when I started reading about Thiomersal and the controversy surrounding it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiomersal_controversy

Pretty fascinating stuff. In the end, my doctor ordered a Rubeola Blood Titer test which proved I was already immune to measles so that I didn't have to take the shot.

I recently had the flu shot and got very sick I wonder if doctors's don't check the ingreadents or just don't care? I have grand children and wonder if there are companies that do not use mercury in there products? How can we know? Please make a list for mothers. Thank You Ms Wilson

I think it's pretty frightening that so many people are pushed into getting flu vaccinations when there is so little evidence of their efficacy -- and so much evidence that they contain mercury.

A recent article by Tom Jefferson, published in the British Medical Journal, found that there is little real evidence that this vaccine should be so routinely recommended. (See article at http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/333/7574/912?ehom=) It surprised me that this article got even moderate publicity, considering the financial ties that abound among Big Pharma, physicians and medical institutions.

My website, www.honestmedicine.com, contains lots of links on the left side of the site to articles that discuss these financial ties. Of special interest, see the articles under "Pharmaceutical Companies" and "Cancer."

Also, my 3-part article, "The JAMA Controversy," discusses the fact that medical journals (in this case, JAMA) publish the results of studies whose physician/authors have these serious financial ties to Big Pharma. I wish it weren't so -- but it is! (Please see http://301url.com/jama-all )

I hope you will also want to visit Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney's website, where you will find information about the Mercury-Free Vaccines Act of 2005. Please see http://maloney.house.gov/index.php?option=com_issues&task=view_issue&issue=243&Itemid=35 . If this link does not work, I have shortened it for easier linking. Please go to
http://301url.com/maloney .

Thanks very much!

Julia Schopick
http://www.honestmedicine.typepad.com


Dear Catherine,

The flu vaccine has never been shown by science to prevent the flu, so to me it's a moot point whether or not it has mercury in it.

On the subject of vaccine additive ingredients, see my $75,000 offer to MDs to drink standard vaccine additive ingredients in a public forum:

http://www.spontaneouscreation.org/SC/links.htm

Just click on the money.

So far no MD has taken me up on it.

Below is a letter sent in to the Ojai Valley News almost two months ago that they did not publish, because it disagreed with their MD columnist's views on vaccines.

Regards,
Jock Doubleday

----

Ojai Valley News
letters@ojaivalleynews.com

To the Editor:

Dr. Rochelle Wilson writes in "Talk to the Doc" that:

"The best way to prevent the flu is get the flu vaccine."

This is incorrect.

No vaccine, and certainly not the flu vaccine, has ever been shown by science to prevent any disease.

See http://www.SpontaneousCreation.org/SC/links.htm

Further, Dr. Wilson makes no mention of the risks associated with the flu vaccine, including Guillain-Barre syndrome (muscle wasting), aching in the chest wall, chills, numbness, fever, severe pain, sleep deprivation, eye focus problems, allergic reactions, polyneuropathy, pneumonia, memory loss, itching, rashes, hives, general autoimmune activation, severe paralysis, and death.

If your doctor suggests you get the flu vaccine this fall, ask if he or she will sign a paper stating that he or she will take full financial responsibility for any illness that you incur from the vaccine. The doctor will refuse, and then you'll get a glimmer of what you're dealing with.

Also ask your doctor if he or she is getting the flu vaccine. The answer may surprise you.

Copious anecdotal evidence suggests that the homeopathic remedy oscillococcinum is the best preventative for flu, when taken at the appropriate time -- at the onset of symptoms.

Disease exists. Vaccines are not now, nor have they ever been, the answer -- according to science.

Regards,

Jock Doubleday
Director
Natural Woman, Natural Man, Inc.
A California 501(c)3 Nonprofit Corporation
http://www.SpontaneousCreation.org
director@spontaneouscreation.org

Address and phone:
Jock Doubleday
386 Avenida de la Vereda
Ojai CA 93023
640-8838
646-5565


-----

Jock Doubleday
Director
Natural Woman, Natural Man, Inc.
A California 501(c)3 Nonprofit Corporation
http://www.SpontaneousCreation.org
director@spontaneouscreation.org

Jock Doubleday is the author of
"Spontaneous Creation:
101 Reasons Not to Have Your Baby in a Hospital, Vol 1:
A Book about Natural Childbirth and the Birth of Wisdom and Power in
Childbearing Women"

I would keep submitting your letter to OVN. They might recognize it's validity on repeated attempts.

Regarding you article July 18th about the vacccine for prevention of cervical cancer. Doesn't a pap smear with the annual exam cover the prevention or are they no longer including that in the annual exam? I know I had ti request mine but I'm over 65.

Back to The Ojai Post home